Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Index Of /amateurs What Do You Think Of The Fact That Liberals Can Cite The Official Websites Of Scientific Organization?

What do you think of the fact that liberals can cite the official websites of scientific organization? - index of /amateurs

in support of the people, global warming,

while the Conservatives have used to refer to the editorial policy of web sites and fans as the CATO Institute, heritage.com only boilers.com, youtube.com junkscience.com, wikipedia.com etc., etc.?

Here is my list again.

Official notice HOW I quote statements directly from the official websites of scientific organizations.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index ...

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

In reply to my three questions, then I could be taken seriously. Otherwise you are just one side of the linker.

Anonymous said...

In reply to my three questions, then I could be taken seriously. Otherwise you are just one side of the linker.

Pfo said...

... And his "appointment" is a question from Yahoo Answers. Price. I'm also not going to go here. Go home to be a troll, global warming a hoax to get you into the belief in something, such as terrorism to frighten. Get your eco-terrorist garbage out of here and go.

Frank Dileo said...

That makes me think differently than they do. They are socialists, an.

~ßinαry Per$uašiøns~ said...

Far-right conservatives have taken root in his mind that these are world-renowned scientists and organizations, a part of the world "Gov't" conspiracy "to interfere with the sovereignty of the United States."

TECHX69 said...

I always admired clever people. In general, you can determine bullsh \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ u0026lt; than others, of course not.

Please do not think my "smart" category. Ever. They test this by a scientific fact and policy-making bullsh \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ u0026lt it.

Jason A said...

Climatologist Bob Carter:
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story ...

Global Warming Part:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/ar ...

Global Warming as a joke:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/timaruherald/4064 ...

"The father of the modern science of climatology," jokes Nutjobs Al Gore and his science broken

http://www.wecnmagazine.com/2007issues/m ...

Q: Can you with things that do not have the greatest impact and where you put carbon dioxide on the list?

R. Well, let me give you a fact. During the first 30 meters of the atmosphere, on average, the output radiation of the earth, what CO2 is supposed to influence how much [is] of the reflected energy is absorbed by water vapor? During the first 30 meters, 80 percent, okay?

Q: Eighty percent of the heat is radiated from the surface is absorbed in the first 30 meters of water ...

A: And how much is absorbed by carbon dioxide? Eight hundredths of a percent. One-thousandth as important as WAter vapor. You can go and spit and have the same effect as doubling carbon dioxide.


Tens of thousands of scientists to discredit the man warming:
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?F ...

Kyoto Hypocrisy far left exposed by the Guardian newspaper:
http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0% 2 ...

Kilimanjaro, by Al Gore is on display:
http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNe ...

Post a Comment